In a very recent post, I referenced an article about a father in Italy who is trying to allow his daughter to pass away after being in a vegetative state for 17 years.
The father finally received permission for the courts, only to have his wishes for his daughter revoked at the last moment.
Many religious people speak out against the father's desire for euthanasia, calling the act outright murder.
And the courts say that the clinic cannot allow the daughter to die because of the unlawfulness to pull feeding tubes from a patient. Doing so would be refusing food to a patient.
I wonder if church leaders would change their minds about euthanasia should one of their Cardinals or priests fall ill and remain in a vegetative state for the next 17 years.
I also wonder how many religious people can call euthanasia outright murder when they don't even want scientists to learn more about stem cells -- which can prolong and save lives.
I admit, pulling feeding tubes does seem harsh. But can't a peaceful, humane way be found besides starvation?
Can't a more humane solution be found than just keeping her alive as a vegetable? How is keeping this poor woman in this state any more humane than euthanasia?
Oh, that's right . . . her vegetative state is God's will.
Sorry, I forgot about that.
Here's the follow-up article: Italian Right-to-die move blocked